- · 《中国测试》编辑部征稿[10/30]
- · 《中国测试》杂志社刊物[10/30]
- · 《中国测试》期刊栏目设[10/30]
- · 《中国测试》数据库收录[10/30]
- · 《中国测试》投稿方式[10/30]
- · 中国测试版面费是多少[10/30]
Can Driverless Cars Be Safe?
作者:网站采编关键词:
摘要:In March, a woman was hit by one of Uber’s driverless cars while jaywalking from a median strip across two lanes of traffic on a highway in Tempe, Arizona. Her death, the first case of a fatal pedestrian accident caused by a self-driving
In March, a woman was hit by one of Uber’s driverless cars while jaywalking from a median strip across two lanes of traffic on a highway in Tempe, Arizona. Her death, the first case of a fatal pedestrian accident caused by a self-driving car, has raised the debates over who is responsible, as well as whether the testing of driverless technology should be suspended just as the number of autonomous cars being tested on the roads of cities around the globe takes off.
Innovation unstoppable
Ma Rong (): The accident in Tempe has sparked a heated debate among the public. Opponents of driverless cars have taken this opportunity to push the government to limit the development of this new technology. Undoubtedly, this is a heavy blow to the driverless car industry.
Since they first appeared, opponents have never stopped doubting the safety of driverless cars. They argue that it is unwise to put our life in the hands of machines, and that traffic accidents are certain to follow.
Dear Readers,Forum is a column that provides a space for varying perspectives on contemporary Chinese invite you to submit personal viewpoints on past and current topics(in either English or Chinese).
Please provide your name and address along with
your comments If we compare the figures, we will find that human-driven cars are more unreliable than driverless cars, and if autonomous vehicles were to completely replace human drivers,the rate of accidents would drop sharply because humans cannot compete with the processing power of computers.
Driving is the process of collecting information from the road and responding to it properly, but humans are actually not very good at this. Human eyes and ears cannot compete with the ability of advanced sensors to collect information, and the reaction speed of computers is much faster than the human brain.
As for the accident in Tempe, the point now is pinpointing the technical faults that led to the fatal crash and working out how to improve the current system instead of focusing on ethics or preventing the development of driverless cars.
New technology will always face obstacles in the early stages of its automobiles and planes were first invented, aristocrats fond of carriages began to satirize them and doubt their should respect technology and approach these issues with a more rational and tolerant attitude rather than intimidation or irritation. The government also needs to work out a legal de finition for responsibility in traf fic accidents involving driverless cars.
Hu Han (The Beijing News): Is the technology behind driverless cars posing a threat to safety on the road? A misjudgment may well ruin the emerging technology of self-driving vehicles. Disbelief in technology seems to have again bolstered the public’s trust in human beings and the belief that to let humans behind the wheel is somehow safer. However, this blind judgment is not well-founded. Today,big data and sensor technology, as well as autonomous vehicles’ systems of logic to identify obstacles and their communications channels, have developed to such a high level that they are more reliable and safer than human drivers, rather than the other way round. Human errors resulting from drunk driving and poor driving skills are still unavoidable.
According to local police, in the Uber accident in Tempe, the woman was walking a bicycle from a median strip when she was hit by the self-driving car. It is a case of jaywalking, and whether it had been a driverless car or a mistake by a human driver, it would have been dif ficult to avoid.
Nonetheless, this seminal case of death caused by a driverless car has ignited public concern about the technology, particularly since no one is clear on whom the accident should be blamed.
In ordinary traffic accidents, human drivers will be held accountable and thus manned cars are considered to be controllable. When it comes to driverless cars, there is no such individual in the car to be blamed. As a result, we are now faced with two extreme choices: to trust self-driving technology absolutely and its superiority over human beings, or to be extremely strict with its use so as not to allow any accident to come from it. Self-driving technology is now facing not only technical but also ethical challenges.
Xia Zhenbin (Legal Daily): At present,self-driving technology is becoming increasingly advanced off road. However, driverless cars must go through road testing before we can decide whether they are able to cope with this complicated real environment. Is it safe to let them run automatically on the road without a driver? It is hard to say.
Risks and obstacles are inevitable as we march toward technological innovation and exploration. Before the real cause of the selfdriving car accident in Tempe is clear, we cannot simply conclude that autonomous driving is unsafe and cease our exploration of this technology. Take conventional automobiles as an example. When they first traveled on the road, many people were also against them, saying that they were too fast and dangerous compared with traditional carriages. But as traf fic lights were set up and transport legislation improved, concerns dissipated and cars became widely used.
文章来源:《中国测试》 网址: http://www.zgcszzs.cn/qikandaodu/2021/0220/541.html
上一篇:论新的科学技术在犯罪心理测试中的应用
下一篇:一种基于和改进的码率控制算法